macmeekin.com 

Dan MacMeekin         Attorney at Law        Washington, DC, USA

Home Up Library Island Links Biography Contact

ISLAND LAW

LibraryArticles

Analysis of the Fourteen Proposed Amendments 

to the FSM Constitution (as amended) 

by John R. Haglelgam

Return to the article outline

Back Next

[Value Added Taxes]

[52.2% of the voters in the August 27, 2002, referendum voted in favor of this amendment.  A 75% affirmative vote was required to pass the amendment, so the amendment failed.]

8. Committee Proposal No. 01-13:

This proposed amendment would amend Section 3 of Article IX by adding a new subsection (d). This new subsection empowers the national government and the states "to levy value added taxes."

ANALYSIS:

This value-added tax (known as VAT) is intended to replace the gross revenue tax and the import tax. It is probably fairer and is much more progressive in its application than the current gross revenue tax. Under the current gross revenue tax, an importer pays tax when merchandise is sold to a store, and the store again pays tax when it sells the same merchandise to the customer. Additionally, the gross revenue tax applies only to private businesses and not to the government-affiliated businesses, giving the latter an unfair advantage. The import taxes have the disadvantage of hampering development of export-oriented businesses because these businesses must pay taxes on the materials they need to expand their operations.

Top of page

The value added tax is a consumption tax and is levied on the consumers of goods and services. Since this tax is spread across a large portion of the population, it could be lower than other taxes. Export businesses will benefit from this value-added tax because they will not pay tax on goods they sell abroad. Additionally, they will receive value-added tax credit for the tax they pay on materials they buy locally to manufacture the goods they export.

The states are looking for new ways to increase their revenue to adequately discharge their primary responsibility for funding education and health services. This value-added tax is one such source of revenue that the states may utilize.

Politically, the approval of this value-added tax might diffuse the on-going friction between the national government and the states regarding division of revenues collected by the national government.

©  John R. Haglelgam, March 4, 2002

Back Next

Top of page

Return to the article outline

 

  Dan MacMeekin  2000 -2008            Disclaimer  - the fine print                February  24, 2008

Partner,